Abroad at Home
Academically Speaking
Arts & Entertainment
At Home Abroad
Bollywood
Books
Business Wise
Cracking Up
Cuisine
Diaspora
Faith Matters
Fashion
Groundswell
India File
India Inc
InMerica
InSource
It's a Techie Life
Lifestyle
Media Watch
New Generation
Politics
Reverse Take
Single Desi
Sports
Star Gazing
Travel
Unconventional Wisdom
Under Construction
   
 
Download our
Media Kit here
 
 
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
 
 
Triumph in The Air

by Shekhar Deshpande

The culture we placed our faith in, is hounding our freedoms.

There is talk of Empire in the air! As the nation prepares to go to war, absolutely inevitable at this moment, several pundits, from the left to right, have spoken of equal inevitability of the Empire. That is, Empire like the Roman or the British empires, both vanquished to the dustbins of history, but once empires nevertheless. What does it feel like to speak from within this Empire?
It is hard to fathom fully how one feels today. There isn't much opposition to anything anymore. Whatever opposition there is, is flimsy at best and the policy makers believe that it would evaporate once the yellow ribbons are tied around trees or lampposts. Even though Susan Sarandon has a lot to say on behalf of those 40 percent who seem to oppose the coming war, it is hardly affecting the ever-increasing tempo in the city on the hill. The French and the Germans are lining up to oppose the war, but they were dismissed in a flash by Donald Rumsfeld as "old Europe," and therefore entirely inconsequential.
There seems to be some consensus that Saddam Hussain is a rogue and one would be justified in kicking him out. But there is little consensus that there are equally despicable guys like that around the world. The reach of the Empire cannot touch them. Any power that dictates the terms of its own policy without reasoned justification is an Empire, after all.
How should one oppose from within the Empire? There is fear even in the hearts of the brave and the minds of the thoughtful. Many are walking around dazed and bewildered at the shape of things and the grasp of power. Freedom of expression is now limited to opposing your local congressman who does not seem to bring in that much bacon.
For those who bear mixed and weary identities of many cultures and mixed histories, that is, people like us, there is little choice but to watch for our daily bread, contain our free thoughts and celebrate the freedoms at the shopping malls. This is a particularly difficult choice since some of us looked up to this place for its values of freedom and justice. It is an uncanny phenomenon; the culture we placed our faith in is hounding our freedoms.
This past December, I was told of a tale that many American travelers in Europe wear Canadian flags and logos so as not to bring attention to themselves. Richard Belzer argued vigorously with a non-descript talk show host recently that to be an American in Europe is like being a Jew in Germany (during the Nazi era). Belzer, himself a resident of France, disagreed with the sentiment, but agreed with the conditions.
The rest of the world does not like Americans either. Almost everyone sympathized with the tragedies of Sept. 11. But almost nobody can understand how America can be such a bully in forcing its foreign policy, in ignoring world opinion and in not using its power judiciously to work against \ dictatorial and obviously unjust regimes around the world. Then there are other contradictions, hypocrisies and discontinuities in foreign policies. While all of this continues, the war talk continues unabated as if no one can hear the voices of dissent from around the world. For most of the world this is bewildering. How can a generous and well endowed nation force its will on the people of the world, as it chooses tyranny in one place and opposes it in another? It is beyond the reach of reason for most that a fair and just struggle against terrorism can be so selective and yet invite more of it.
Some of our loud thinkers have expressed these conditions in benevolent and almost inevitable terms. They say all of this is a welcome chapter in history as we witness the high days of the responsibilities of an Empire. The American Empire, writes Christopher Hitchens in Slate, cleans up after it kills. Brother Hitchens is, of course, more sophisticated than that, but one get the flavor of his argument. This is an Empire because it establishes just conditions, gets rid of inhuman and brutal regimes and this is the only force that is capable of staying in the devastated lands to care for people. This is the benevolent aspect of this Empire. He likes it, demands more of it, all the while underscores the rewards of having such an Empire.
Michael Ignatieff agrees with Hitchens in New York Times magazine in an article titled "The Burden of the Empire." For him the muscle of the Empire, inevitable and unavoidable as it is, in the wake of increasing oppressive regimes around the world, is beneficial, because it alone can establish the rule of law and provide a good market system that is sometimes called democracy. Ignatieff, the thoughtful warrior on the Left, believes in the necessity of the Empire, adding to the chorus of many across the political landscape.
The last two great empires, those in our recent memory, the Roman and the British, humiliated a large part of humanity although they are remembered for their planned cities and efficient railways. The consensus among these spokespersons for the Empire is to support the benevolent and inevitable aspect of this Empire. But like all empires before this one, the cost for human beings is merely a footnote to history.
One assumes there were voices of reason within these Empires. History tells us, slowly and methodically, that they were either repressed or were never expressed at all. If the reach of the Empires for justice were effective, it would have been more effective with this reason on its side.
There is a particular dilemma for the immigrants, for those who have come ashore to become unwitting participants in the great game of benevolence after violence. Who shall we speak for? The wisdom of our traditions as well as theirs tells us that outsiders have a sharper eye and a keener insight into established paradigms. An outsider brings a different and often fresh perspective. What blinds the insiders becomes clear to us. We have lived in at least two worlds. Such insights have saved the world from catastrophes and have brought about revolutions in our thoughts.
And, the great irony of this great Empire is that the outsiders are shunned, silenced, watched, contained and always maintained under the lens. Those who came here to worship the freedom and judiciousness of the Empire are now cowering for shelter, with no place to return. It is difficult to contemplate the present and it is even more difficult to imagine the future. It is impossible to imagine how the Empire would trace back its steps.
We will soon have a world without Saddam, if not a world without the Kim Jong-Il, or the Saudi princes or the tyrants of Syria. We will have a world with plenty of oil and perhaps even a hydrogen-powered car. Will we ever have a world that is safe, just and fair for this generation of immigrants and for generations to come? Will we always live in the shadows, more worried about the daily bread and less about the lasting values that we have always searched for?
We do not know. What we do know for now is that the new great Empire is about to triumph.




..- End Of Article.....

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home
|
About Us
|
Advertising
|
Feedback
|
Archives
|
Classifieds
|
Events Calendar