| The
Money to Create
By Lavina Melwani
Naseem Khan
is the force behind government funding for South Asian
arts.
In 1976, Naseem Khan,
whose father had emigrated from the Punjab in the
30's, wrote the report, The Arts Britain Ignores,
which was seminal in drawing attention to the minority
arts. The persistent Naseem Khan, now the head of
Cultural Diversity in the Arts Council, struggled
for almost three decades before convincing the government
to provide funding for ethnic arts. She was honored
by the Queen three years ago and awarded the OBE for
her services to cultural diversity.
Q. How many South Asian arts groups are there in the
UK?
A: It is impossible to quantify the number of South
Asian arts groups in the UK because they exist at
so many different levels, from music groups around
gurudwaras and dance classes around temples across
the length and breadth of the country to professional
dance, theatre and music companies. Some have an international
reputation; some have local significance. What I try
to do in terms of policy is to convince funders that
there is no one desired pattern -- community and professional
often feed each other. For instance, the dancer Akram
Khan learnt his Kathak in a very traditional setting
from Shri Pratap Pawar, and then went on to graduate
from the Northern School of Contemporary Dance.
Q: You have played a major role in getting these groups
recognized for funding. Could you elaborate?
A: I have been involved for around 30 years in the
fight to get the UK to respond appropriately to the
change in its own population. At first, these arts
groups and artists were seen as "ethnic artists" (and
indeed most often saw themselves in that way too).
However, the ground has increasingly shifted -- and,
in my view, in the right way -- to seeing this work
as a manifestation of the UK's multicultural spectrum.
The work is mainstream and not marginal. Creative
conversations take place, such as Akram's of Kathak
with contemporary dance that means the whole community
engages itself with the values and virtues of new
art forms. We do not essentialize the art.
Q: How has the government helped these groups?
A: The Arts Council of England is the major funding
body for the arts in England. Similar (but smaller
) arts councils serve Scotland, Wales and Northern
Ireland. ACE, for instance, funds the Shobana Jeyasinghe
Dance Company, a company that explores the interface
between South Asian classical Bharat Natyam and western
avant garde composers. It also funds Moti Roti, Keith
Khan and Ali Zaidi's highly imaginative company: Moti
Roti develops large scale pageants, performances and
installations that use elements such as Bollywood,
Caribbean carnival, gay culture and performance art.
They staged the Queen's' Jubilee Parade down the Mall
to Buckingham Palace earlier this year and are now
working with the Builders Association of New York
on a version of Aladdin, connecting it up with Mumbai
and Bangalore.
Q. Do you think South Asians are managing to keep
their culture alive, and even vibrant, in the UK?
A. Yes, I do think the culture is being kept alive.
More importantly it is being challenged, so it keeps
a fine creative edge. The connection with the sub-continent
is important, but a number of artists have felt, interestingly,
that working here has given them more freedom to create
than they would have had in India. For instance, the
potter Loretta Braganza feels that she would not have
been able to work in that medium had she been living
and working in India.
It has not been easy in some areas (notably where
large financial stakes are involved). The makers of
East is East had to convince a suspicious film finance
world that a film about Pakistanis in the north of
England could have wider selling power. But its huge
success opened the doors to Bend it Like Beckham and
doubtless more to come.
..-
End Of Article.....
|