| Here
Comes the Bride… and the Bride |
By Kavita Chhibber |
India’s comedy king Johnny Lever in
an exclusive interview with Little India. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The
gray cat dozes contentedly on a bench in the afternoon sun as
Arvind Kumar, his head shaded by a floppy blue hat, plucks weeds
from his garden. Upstairs in the San Jose home they have shared
together for over a decade, Ashok Jethanandani is enjoying his
Sunday siesta. It’s a scene of cozy, almost Normal Rockwellesque
Americana. But in it
lie the seeds of a domestic revolution that has caught the attention
of everyone, including the White House. Ashok and Arvind are gay.
They have the house, the cats, the twin Toyotas, the joint bank
account and the Costco shopping card. Now they would like to get
married. |
On Friday, Feb. 20, Ashok and
Arvind rose at 5:30 am and drove an hour to San Francisco to
do just that. When they reached City Hall, there were already
some 300 couples ahead of them in line.
Around noon they realized it was
futile. But Ashok has no regrets. “It was so festive. So many
people were rooting for us. Even the garbage truck went by and
honked its support.” Though they came home empty handed that
day, Ashok, editor of India Currents magazine, found on their
doorstep a huge bouquet of flowers and a card from all his co-workers.
|
| |
|
Ashok Jethanandani and Arvind Kumar just |
got an email from the city of San Fransisco
|
| canceling their April 30 marriage |
| appointment. |
| |
|
| “It was completely unexpected,”
says Ashok. “I hand’t really given them any warning.” The weekend
before when San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom set the nation abuzz
by instructing City Hall to issue marriage licenses to same-sex
couples, Mala Nagarajan and Vega Subramaniam were visiting Mala’s
sister in San Francisco from Seattle. They watched the excitement
but decided not to be a part of it. They had already had their
own wedding ceremony at their home in Washington in 2002, what
they laughingly call “perhaps the first lesbian Hindu wedding
in America!”
“Personally I would rather have the state be out of our personal
relationship,” says Vega. “For me the most important thing was
to have a ceremony with our loved ones. We were not sure we wanted
to take the legal step.” But within a month the repercussions
from San Francisco had reached Seattle. On March 8, the Northwest
Women’s Law Center and Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund
filed a lawsuit on behalf of six gay and lesbian couples who were
denied marriage licenses. One of the couples was Mala and Vega.
“We wanted to help get the right to choose whether or not to get
married. We wanted people to be able to bring their partners over
(from another country) and have access to health care benefits,”
says Mala. |
|
|
|
A
decade ago, few lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) Indians
were visible in the United States. though major cities like San
Francisco and New York had organizations like Trikone and SALGA.
While mainstream gay America was fighting about the right to serve
in the military or job discrimination, LGBT South Asians were grappling
with issues of coming out and marriage. Now as America wrestles
with the idea of same-sex marriage, LGBT desis find their Number
One issue is suddenly headline news.
Samina Ali can relate to this desi preoccupation with marriage.
The San Francisco writer entered into an arranged marriage 13 years
ago with a man who turned out to be gay. “In Western culture, children
grow up, leave the home, have lovers, get married or not; in the
end, a person’s life belongs to him/her,” says the author of Madras
on Rainy Days. “In India, children’s lives belong to their parents,
to their community. So the idea of a person having the freedom to
declare his/her homosexuality and then getting married to a person
of the same sex seems almost unbelievable.”
But
that was what happened to Aditya Advani. |
|
Mala Nagarajan and Vega and |
| Subramaniam are among six |
| gay lesbian couples suing the |
| city of Seattle after being |
| denied marriage licenses. |
| |
|
When
he came out his mother suggested running a matrimonial in the Hindustan
Times looking for a husband. “I think Indians can understand marriage,
even same-sex marriage, more easily than singledom,” says Aditya,
a landscape architect in Berkeley.
In
1993 when he took his partner Michael Tarr home to New Delhi, he
resisted going to yet another family wedding. “No one is ever going
to come to my wedding,” he complained. His mother thought for a
moment and then said, “Why not? We could have a ceremony for you
and Michael.” Swami Bodhananda, the family’s spiritual mentor, presided
over the ceremony dedicating it to Ayyappa, son of an unusual union
between two male gods, Lord Vishnu and Lord Shiva. “I couldn’t believe
my luck,” reflects Aditya. “Openly gay and married in my parents’
drawing room at the age of thirty. Right on schedule as a good Indian
boy should be.” Not everyone’s mother is quite so understanding.
“My father and brother were excited because Mala is so likeable,”
says Vega. “But my mother thought why flaunt it, why be proud of
something shameful.”
When
Ruth Vanita, a professor in English in Montana, told her family
in India that she was going to marry her partner Mona Bachman in
2000, the initial reaction was negative though they were fond of
Mona. “The usual problem, ‘What will people say?’” remembers Ruth.
As it turns out few people said anything. “Most relatives ignored
it; the uncle and aunt to whom I am closest gave us a nice present,”
says Ruth. Mona’s 87-year-old mother had her qualms as well. But
in the end she walked her daughter down the aisle. Now Ruth’s parents
have adjusted. “They now live with us, and my mother refers to Mona
as her daughter-in-law,” says Ruth.
Though their wedding vows have no legal significance, for Ruth,
a wedding ceremony was like a second coming out. “(It) helped me
to make the relationship visible to family and friends as more than
just a friendship,” she says. “We are married, whether or not the
state likes it. Marriage is defined by people, not by governments.”
And it is the people who attend who make the ceremony meaningful.
|
|
|
|
| |
When Yatin Chawathe married his
boyfriend of five years, Thomas Zambito III in Seattle this February,
the most moving moment was just looking around the room. “Eighty
percent of the guests had come from out of town. Just for our
wedding. That meant so much to us to know they were there to acknowledge
our relationship,” says Yatin.
Tom’s parents flew in from upstate New York.
Yatin’s parents flew in from Mumbai. Though everyone initially
was nervous about a public ceremony, by the time the big day arrived,
the mothers were completely in “mother of the groom” mode. Yatin’s
mother was hunting down CDs with specific mantras. “On the morning
of the wedding, my mother was stringing the wedding garlands with
Yatin’s mom,” remembers Tom.The national hullabaloo about gay
marriages is a legal one involving talk of constitutional amendments,
law suits and counter law suits, and state Supreme Courts. But
for couples like Yatin and Tom, the moment is all about personal
rituals.Without any roadmap to follow, lesbian and gay couples
get to create their own ceremonies freely borrowing from each
other’s cultures.
Ruth and Mona’s Hindu-Jewish ceremony involved
a chuppah, breaking glass, a three tier wedding cake, Vedic shlokas
and jaimalas. |
|
|
| Yatin Chawathe married his |
| boyfriend of five years Thomas |
| Zambito III in Seattle this |
| February. |
| |
|
Mala and Vega wanted a Hindu ceremony with a saptapadi
but without gender terms and hierarchy. When the moment came to
honor the elders, Mala’s sister, a professor of religious studies,
saluted “all the gay, lesbian and queer ancestors who paved the
way.” Tom and Yatin had a curtain ceremony and went round the
fire seven times while a Christian minister presided over the
ceremony and a friend wept as she read a Sufi poem. For dinner
they made sure everything reflected the mingling of their Indian
and Italian roots — the main entree was Spicy Lamb Curry with
Sicilian Risotto!
Of course, there are challenges. “The United Nations chapel in
New York, which is supposed to be dedicated to equality and inclusiveness,
refused to let us hold the wedding there,” says Ruth. Yatin and
Tom couldn’t find a Hindu priest. “Most made excuses, though only
one said he wouldn’t do gay marriages. And he was the white American
priest from the Hare Krishna temple,” says Yatin.
Mala and Vega had a more basic problem. They didn’t have wedding
sarees. When they put up a sign looking for wedding saris at local
Indian grocery store, they got a call instead from a woman whose
husband was a priest. Though he was taken aback to hear two women
were planning to get married, he soon got into the spirit of things.
“He was looking for references to unions such as ours,” remembers
Mala. “He didn’t find anything specific but he found lots of references
to ‘two souls coming together’ in union, with no references to
the gender of those ‘souls’.”
While the ceremonies are moving and beautiful, in the end do
they make a difference? Aditya Advani thinks so. “It’s a social
cement that holds you together,” says Aditya. “Everyone understands
we are a unit now.”
Arvind’s mother, who had once adamantly rejected Arvind’s sexuality,
presided over a Hindu ceremony complete with pheras he had with
Ashok in Toronto in 1996. “I came full circle from being the alienated
teenager, angry with my parents for not accepting me the way I
was,” says Arvind. “I finally entered the family circle.”
But while families are accepting, some gay activists are not sure
that with all the discrimination and immigration issues LGBT people
face, marriage should be the top agenda item. |
|
|
|
| |
“Marriage may not be the best institution,”
says Ashok. “But it’s like gays in the military. I wondered why
would anyone want to join the military anyway. But it’s important
to have the choice.”
Ultimately, says Mala it’s about fairness. She remembers going
to heterosexual weddings and wondering “What did they do to deserve
this?”
Watching the drama unfold in San Francisco, Samina Ali is convinced
that even if the courts annul it, the images of the long lines
of excited couples will have an impact. “Even if other parts of
the world are not yet ready to succumb to this fever, at least
the knowledge of its existence will help shape and mold future
conscience. Men love men, women love women!” she says.
The courts may have put the wedding fever in San Francisco in
a limbo and the couples have gone back to their daily lives. But
in some subtle ways they have been changed forever. Aditya is
waiting anxiously for his photographer husband to return from
a research trip to Arunachal Pradesh. “If they still allow marriages,
we’ll definitely do it,” he says. |
|
|
| Ruth Vanita married her partner |
| Mona Bachman in an unrecognized |
| ceremony. |
|
| Yatin and Tom are putting their wedding pictures
up on their website.
They are not yet quite used to referring to each other as “husband,”
but Tom doesn’t care. “I still look at my wedding ring and it
still brings a smile to my face” he says. “I can’t believe I finally
have this ring on my finger.”
Mala and Vega are getting used to the media glare of being activists
while Mala’s mom complains, “When are you guys going to adopt?
Hurry up. I am getting old.”
Ruth and Mona are still living in Montana where Ruth is researching
a book on same sex marriage and its antecedents in India and the
West.
Ashok and Arvind just got an email from the city of San Francisco
canceling their April 30 marriage appointment while the state
Supreme Court tries to sort things out. But they are patient.
The registration licenses from being domestic partners in Palo
Alto and California hang on the wall where other couples might
have pictures of their children.
“We are just fighting to simplify our lives,” says Arvind. “I
don’t want a Palo Alto date, a state of California date, a Hindu
ceremony date. I just want one date, one wedding anniversary like
everyone else.”
|
|
|
..- End Of Article..... |